Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of Sylvan O. Greenlee

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 25, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6117PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in finally rejecting, on the ground of double patenting, claims 1, 2, and 9 of appellant’s application for a patent on an epoxide resin composition containing a latent curing catalyst. The board reversed the examiner and allowed claims 7, 8, 10, and 11.

The invention relates to a composition comprising epoxide resins and a delayed action catalyst, the latter consisting of a “complex of boron trifluoride and any of a wide variety of nitrogen…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Application of ColemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  3. In Re CarltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. In re DavisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  5. Application of HornemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Christian Zickendraht and Arthur BuehlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Charles Curtis SimmonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  3. Application of William G. Baird, Jr., Carl A. Lindstrom, Jr., Arthur L. Besse, Jr., and Donald J. D'EntrEmontCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of Kemper M. HammellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  5. Application of William A. Higgins and William M. LesuerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API