Legal Opinion
Winkelmann v. Calvert
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 9, 1946No. 5084PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge
This appeal by Winkelmann from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention to Calvert involves not only tjie same parties,but also the same general subject matter as Interference Ho. 14,296 previously involved and litigated to a final decision here in Calvert v. Winkelmann, 29 C. C. P. A. (Patents) 1200, 129 F. (2d) 536, 54 USPQ 257.
More specifically, this interference was declared for the purpose of determining the question of priority of invention between Winkel-mann’s patent Ho. 2,115,055, granted April 26,1938, on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In re Retail Clerks International Protective Ass'nCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stoudt v. GuggenheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- In re LoiseleurCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re SawyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Alumatone Corporation v. Vitavar CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Fischer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951