Legal Opinion
La Plante v. Hubbard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1923No. 17882PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ring county, Smith,. J., entered November 25, 1922, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
First of all,, the appellant had a written contract with the Union Pacific Railroad Company, known as “ Order-T-220,” whereby the railroad agreed to purchase not less than 150,000 and not more than 350,000 hewn ties, to be delivered by November 1, following the date of the contract, which was in April, 1921. Having this contract, the appellant, on April 4, 1921, entered into the following agreement with the respondent :
“I, É. M.' La Plante, party of the first part, agree to ship, and I, Gf. M. Hubbard, party of the second part, agree to buy, all hewn ties from the Dupont Powder Company’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Tingley v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Stofferan v. DepewWashington Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
- Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Snyder v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Shell Oil Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Hunters Cattle Co. v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.