Legal Opinion

Stofferan v. Depew

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1914No. 11447PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Okanogan county, Pendergast, J., entered October 26, 1912, dismissing an action on contract, upon overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtCeow, C. J.

Action by Louis Stofferan against Josephine M. Depew to recover $720. The complaint, in substance, alleged that, on June 7, 1909, plaintiff purchased from defendant eighty acres of soldier’s additional homestead scrip, and received from her a written instrument reading as follows:

“Conconully, Wash. June 7th, 1909. “To Whom it May Concern:
“This is to certify that I have this day sold and assigned to Louis Stofferan 80 acres of soldier’s additional scrip, or additional homestead right, originally owned by William Walker, and I hereby for and in consideration of the sum of $720, to me in hand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Badders & Britt v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  3. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Brown v. EverhardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. La Plante v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Bader v. Moore Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Inman v. W. E. Roche Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API