Legal Opinion

In re Morris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2012No. Docket No. 142759; Docket No. 143673PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

These combined cases require us to examine the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), 25 USC 1901 through 1963. In particular, we must decide several issues relating to ICWA’s notice provision, 25 USC 1912(a), which mandates that notice of certain involuntary child custody proceedings be sent to the appropriate Indian tribe or to the Secretary of the Interior “where the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved. . ..” Because the question whether notice violations occurred in the instant cases begins with determining whether the tribal-notice requirement of 25 USC 1912(a)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Matter of Adoption of HallowayUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re KreftMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. LoCiceroMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sheboygan County Department of Human Services v. Neal J.G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re Olive/Metts MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In re Payne/Pumphrey/FortsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. In the Interest of M.H.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  4. In re COHMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. In re McCarrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API