In re COH
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
This case requires us to consider the interplay between MCL 722.954a and MCL 712A.19c. Specifically, we must determine whether the preference for placement with relatives created by MCL 722.954a is relevant to a court’s consideration of a petition to appoint a guardian under MCL 712A.19c(2).
Because we conclude that the two statutes apply at different and distinct stages of child protective proceedings, we hold that there is no preference for placement with relatives as part of a guardianship determination under MCL 712A.19c(2). Accordingly, because the Court of Appeals in this case applied a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re RoodMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Edry v. AdelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re TKMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- in Re Certified Question (Deacon v. Pandora)Michigan Supreme Court · 2016
- Bearing360 LLC v. Larry CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Bearing360 LLC v. Larry CameronMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- In Re Von Greiff EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.