Legal Opinion
People v. LoCicero
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1996No. Docket Nos. 104174, 104545, Calendar No. 10PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
Levin, J.
The question presented is whether the officers had reasonable suspicion under Terry 1 to stop the defendants. We agree with the district and circuit court judges that they did not, and that the evi dence obtained must be suppressed. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, which found that the stop and seizure were justified.
I
Defendants, Todd Stephen LoCicero and Robert Cook Mueller, were charged with possession with intent to deliver less than fifty grams of cocaine, 2 possession with intent to deliver marijuana, 3 and possession of open intoxicants in a vehicle.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. OliverMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. GivansMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.