Hogan v. Anthony
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Paul Nourse, A. D. Laughlin, O’Melveny, Millikin & Tuller and Hewlings Mumper for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in an action brought to recover $500 paid by him to the defendant Anthony on account of the purchase price of an automobile truck. Anthony is the only defendant who appeals. For convenience, we shall treat the case as though appellant were the sole defendant.
On August 12, 1914, defendant agreed to sell and plaintiff agreed to buy the truck for the sum of $1,650. At that time plaintiff paid $500 on account of the purchase price and agreed to pay the balance in eleven monthly installments of $100 each, and one, the last, of $50, all to be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Gardiner v. McDonoghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Noll v. BaidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- C.I.T. Corporation v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Wright & Co. v. ShacklefordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- Cole Motor Car Co. v. O'KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.