Legal Opinion
Doe v. Board of Education
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 15, 2003No. AC 22689PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Jane Doe,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered subsequent to *297its granting of the motion to strike filed by the defendant, the board of education of the city of New Haven. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the motion to strike, which alleged that the action is barred by the doctrine of governmental immunity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff filed a two count substitute complaint on May 11, 2001. In count one of the substitute complaint,2 the plaintiff alleges the following facts. On April…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Silberstein v. 54 Hillcrest Park Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Vejseli v. PashaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- DeConti v. McGloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.