Legal Opinion

Burns v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1994No. 14767PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether a school child may bring an action *642for the negligent maintenance of public school grounds during school hours because he is one of a foreseeable class of victims and thus qualifies for an exception to the doctrine of governmental immunity. The plaintiffs, David Burns and his mother, Darlene Vrendburgh, as next friend, brought a four count action against the defendants, the superintendent of schools, William R. Papallo, the Stamford board of education and the city of Stamford, after David had been injured in a fall on an icy high school…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API