Legal Opinion
DeConti v. McGlone
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 29, 2005No. AC 24745PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Maria DeConti, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it granted the defendants’ motion to strike the amended complaint. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly struck her amended complaint. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the present appeal. On June 11, 2000, the plaintiff was driving her automobile on Maple Street in New Britain, when a rotted tree fell on her automobile and crushed it. The tree was located in front of 281 Maple Street, approximately five houses from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burns v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Doe v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Roman v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Roman v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Strycharz v. CadySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Cotto v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NEW HAVENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Vejseli v. PashaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.