Legal Opinion
Silberstein v. 54 Hillcrest Park Associates, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 8, 2012No. AC 32961PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The plaintiffs, Tom Silberstein and Elizabeth Newman, appeal from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants Hillerest Park Tax District and Hillerest Park Association, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court erred in holding that their negligence claim was barred by the doctrine of governmental immunity. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs; see Martinelli v. Fusi, 290 Conn. 347, 350, 963 A.2d 640 (2009); reveals the following facts. The plaintiffs own a home…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Evon v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Purzycki v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Doe v. PetersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mills v. Solution, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Northrup v. WitkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Ventura v. Town of E. HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Cadco, Ltd. v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Haynes v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.