Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Cincinnati Garage Co. v. Bird
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided October 23, 1970No. A-238343PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.
This case involves a determination whether the construction by the city of an elevated walkway above an existing sidewalk but within the confines of the street constitutes a taking of property rights of the abutting landowner for which it is entitled to compensation in damages or for which the court should issue a writ of mandamus ordering the city to institute an appropriation proceeding.
Plaintiff-relator is the owner of two parcels of real *70estate in downtown Cincinnati. These parcels, which for clarity we will designate hereinafter as the Walnut-Third Garage and the Main-Third Garage, are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- Anthony Carlin Co. v. Halle Bros. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1926
- Akins v. County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Occo Realty Co. v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Preston v. WeilerOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Bramson v. City of BereaCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1971
- Wray v. FitchOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.