Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. Ohio Water Service Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1969No. 68-353PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Upon occasion, this court has been confronted with the problem of determining whether a particular use of property subject to an easement, for highway purposes, amounts to an additional burden or servitude entitling its owner to added compensation. It is clear that if there is an added burden or servitude, Section 19 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio requires that the property owner be compensated. In the absence of a finding of an added burden or servitude, that constitutional guarantee is inapplicable.

The question presented in the instant case, coupled with the dynamic impact of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hofius v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. CommrsOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Centel Cable Television Co. of Ohio, Inc. v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jolliff v. Hardin Cable Television Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Bogart v. CapRock Communications Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Bentel v. County of BannockIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. New Wen, Inc. v. Marchbanks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API