Legal Opinion

Anthony Carlin Co. v. Halle Bros. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

This cause is here on appeal. The action below was to enjoin the city of Cleveland from issuing a building permit and the Halle Bros. Company from constructing a bridge to connect its present department store on the south side of Euclid avenue and north side of Huron road with their new building to be erected on the south side of Huron road.

The cause came on to be heard in the court below and resulted in a judgment for the defendant Halle Bros. Company, and from the decree so entered an appeal was perfected in this court. The facts incident and necessary to a proper understanding and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Field v. BarlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Chicago Dock & Canal Co. v. GarrityIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Swindell v. State ex rel. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ghaster v. City of FostoriaOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klaber v. LakenanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Garage Co. v. Bird, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1970
  3. Bramson v. City of BereaCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Schiederer v. PrestonOhio Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Warren Hill LLC v. SFR Equities LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API