Legal Opinion

Akins v. County Commissioners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1929No. 1526PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

Giving to plaintiff’s petition an interpretation most favorable to him, it may be said that he claims that a vacant and unimproved lot, which he purchased after a grade had been properly established in front thereof, has been damaged by change of such grade, which change was made by the county commissioners in conformity to law, for the purpose of providing an approach to a county bridge over the Ohio canal, but which change was not made by the city in conformity to the law in reference to the change of grade of city streets, and that by reason of the acts of said commissioners, ingress and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Garage Co. v. Bird, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1970
  2. Wray v. FitchOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In Re AppropriationOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Parker v. PrestonOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API