Legal Opinion
Castor v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 1988No. C3-87-1036PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellants John E. Castor, Austin D. Ditzler, Jerome Klukas, Richard S. Scherer, Al H. Michals and William J. Yaeger, Jr., owners of the Barrister’s Trust Building, brought an inverse condemnation action against respondent City of Minneapolis, seeking compensation for the taking of their implied easements of air, light and view. Finding the skyway was a proper street use, the trial court held any resulting damages were noncompensable. We affirm.
FACTS
The facts are not in dispute. The Barristers Trust Building is a two-story office building located at 247 Third Avenue South…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Adams v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Carli v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Willis v. Winona CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State ex rel. Hunt v. City of MontevideoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Castor v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988