Legal Opinion

Barg v. Bousfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1896No. Nos. 9985-(218)PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of tbe district court for Hennepin county, Jamison, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

This is an action for personal injury. Plaintiff had a verdict, and from an order denying a new trial defendants appeal.

The defendants are engaged in the business of manufacturing wooden tubs, pails, and other wooden ware. On April 27, 1894, plaintiff, then an infant between 15 and 16 years of age, was employed in their establishment by one Scott, who had charge of one department of the business, and who' put plaintiff to work carrying wooden bottoms from the car over to one of the saws. Under one of the saws was placed a *357tub to catch the splints, scraps, and sawdust which fell from the saw.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kaillen v. Northwestern Bedding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Walters v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Dayton v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API