Rait v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant company from an order of the district court ■for Hennepin county, Belden, J., denying motions for a new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, after a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $5,495.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Defendant’s counsel, in their brief, disclaim any •desire for a new trial, and expressly consent and request that the •order appealed from be affirmed, unless this court shall hold that, upon the record, the plaintiff was not entitled to a verdict; that is, .as we understand it, unless we shall hold that, upon the record, defendant was entitled to have a verdict directed in its favor. The •case is therefore reduced to very narrow limits.
The action was brought to recover for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant in throwing from the roof of its building into the…
2Cited by28 opinions
- State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- La Bree v. Dakota Tractor & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.