Legal Opinion

Brown v. Douglas Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1910No. Nos. 16,726—(63)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

• Action in tbe district court for Beltrami county against defendant lumber company and tbe partners in tbe firm of Bell & Company to recover -$10,000 for personal injuries. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion. Tbe negligence alleged in tbe complaint was a failure to guard properly tbe dangerous machinery and tbe. absence of tbe guides therefrom.

Read the full summary

• Action in tbe district court for Beltrami county against defendant lumber company and tbe partners in tbe firm of Bell & Company to recover -$10,000 for personal injuries. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion. Tbe negligence alleged in tbe complaint was a failure to guard properly tbe dangerous machinery and tbe. absence of tbe guides therefrom. Tbe case was tried before Stanton, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,500. From an order denying defendant Douglas Lumber Company’s motion for judgment notwithstanding tbe verdict, or for a new trial, it appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

Douglas Lumber Company owns a lath mill at Bemidji, in this state. On February 12, 190T, it entered into a contract with T. W. *69Bell, embodied in a written proposal from him to the company, the material portions of which were the following:

* * * “I -will take yonr lath mill located on Lake Irving, Bemidji, Minn., in its present condition, and will manufacture lath for you in a good workmanlike manner and in accordance with your instructions for the sum of seventy (70) cents per thousand, tied in bundles of fifty in a bundle. * * * I agree to employ experienced men on the bolter and lath…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cruikshank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Barg v. BousfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Rait v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Adams v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Gill v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Alansky v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Wallace v. Pine Tree Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API