Legal Opinion
United States v. International Trading Services, LLC
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 2, 2016No. Slip Op. 16-112; Court 12-00135PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Barnett, Judge:
The United States of America (“United States” ⅛ “Plaintiff”) brings this enforce 1 ment action against International Trading Services, LLC (“ITS”) and Julio Lorza (“Lorza” or “Defendant”) (together, “Defendants”) to recover unpaid duties and pénalties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1592 (2012), 1 or, alternatively, unpaid duties and mandatory accrued interest pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1505. See generally Compl., EOF No. 2. Lorza moves to dismiss the complaint as to himself for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to. state a claim pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. International Trading Services, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
- United States v. Great Neck Saw Mfrs., Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2018
- United States v. Aegis Sec. Ins. Co.United States Court of International Trade · 2019
- United States v. HoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.