Henderson v. C. Thomas Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause came before the Court on plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction. The application is based on the verified bill of complaint and on the affidavits and exhibits thereto attached. Defendants’ response consists of an affidavit by E. H. Rasmussen, together with the exhibits attached, and the oral testimony of L. W. Bailey and E. H. Rasmussen.
Plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants
“(a) from selling or delivering any groceries, food or other commodities subject to the General Maximum Price Regulation at prices in excess of the maximum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. MacIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Henderson v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1942
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. ErvinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1938
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Bowles v. Warner Holding Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
- Bowles v. WardDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Bowles v. SagoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.