Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Sago

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1946No. 5049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, District Judge.

This is a civil action brought by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration against the defendants, Edward Sago and Julia Sago, under and pursuant to the provisions of section 205(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq.

It was the contention of the plaintiff that the defendants violated section 4(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended by the Stabilization Extension Act of 1944, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., in that the defendants charged rents in excess of the Maximum Rent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Brown v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  5. Bowles v. HastingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McRae v. CreedonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Woods v. SchwartzDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Heesy v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Heesy v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API