Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Warner Holding Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 26, 1944No. Civ. 884PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, District Judge.
This is a suit under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, § 205(a), 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 925(a), hereinafter called the Act, by the Administrator of the Office of Price Administration, against Warner Holding Company, to enforce compliance with the Act and the applicable price regulations. A preliminary injunction has been granted. See Brown v. Warner Holding Co., D.C., 50 F.Supp. 593. Plaintiff also seeks an order compelling restitution to certain tenants of rents collected by defendant in excess of “ceilings”. These questions present different considerations and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Henderson v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1942
- Fleming v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- Henderson v. C. Thomas Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Orenstein v. United States. United States v. OrensteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
- Warner Holding Co. v. CreedonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Desper v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Greider v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.