Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Ervin

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1938No. 2981PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon the hearing it was stipulated by the parties in open court that the entire case should be deemed submitted to the court for final determination upon the pleadings, the affidavits filed, by the respective parties, the oral arguments, and the briefs.

The statute the validity of which is challenged is known as the Minnesota Unfair Trade Practices Act, and is entitled, “An act to prohibit unlawful discrimination in the production,. manufacture or distribution of certain commodities, articles, goods, wares and merchandise in trade and to prohibit unfair competitive trade practices, providing…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Borden Company v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. McElhone v. GerorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. People v. Pay Less Drug StoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Bloom v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Louisiana Wholesale Distributors Ass'n v. RosenzweigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API