Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Ward

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1946No. Civil Action No. 4199PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE S. GOURLEY, District Judge.

This is. an action brought by Chester Bowles, Administrator, Office of Price Administration, against Charles S. B. Ward, Arthur J. McCarthy and Norman L. Park-ins, individually and as partners doing business as Wieman and Ward Company.

It is claimed by the Government that the defendants have violated the provisions of MPR 120, and recovery is demanded in the amount of $5827.23, which is three times the overcharge of $1942.41 which it is alleged was made, together with the granting of injunctive relief.

The case is now before the Court on motion filed by the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Dravo Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
  3. Pueblo v. López LugoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
  4. Porter v. BarrettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. United States v. SaundersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API