Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 26, 1944No. 8481PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge..
Defendant appeals from an order granting a preliminary injunction pending the determination of the principal action. The issues are whether there is sufficient evidence upon which to base a preliminary injunction and, if the evidence establishes that defendant has violated the regulation, is the injunction broader than the violations warrant.
The application for the injunction was brought by the Price Administrator pursuant to § 205(a) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 901 et seq., to enforce compliance with § 4 of the Act. Section 4 of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Martin Frank, and Nylo-Thane Plastics Corp., Maurice Minuto, Olanda Minuto, Louis Braunston, Leonard FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Federal Trade Commission v. Rhodes Pharmacal Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.