Legal Opinion
Guizhou Tyre Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 17, 2018No. Slip Op. 18-140; Consolidated Court No. 17-00101PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Richard W. Goldberg, Senior Judge *1267Goldberg, Senior Judge: This action arises from a challenge by plaintiffs, Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. and Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd., (collectively, "Guizhou" or "GTC"), consolidated plaintiff Xuzhou Xugong Tyres Co., Ltd., ("Xugong"), and intervenor-plaintiff Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. ("TUTRIC") (collectively "Plaintiffs") to certain aspects of the final results published by the Department of Commerce ("the Department" or "Commerce") of the underlying administrative review of the countervailing duty order on off-the-road…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Risen Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.