Legal Opinion

Clearon Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 8, 2020No. Consol. 17-00171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Consol. Court No. 17-00171 Page 2 United States,

43 CIT __,

359 F. Supp. 3d 1344

(2019) (“Clearon I”).1 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order (May 16, 2019), P.R.R.2 5 (“Remand Results”). Jurisdiction lies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (2012) and 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2)(B)(iii) (2012). In the final results under review in Clearon I, Commerce used adverse facts available, pursuant to its authority under 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(a)-(b),3 to determine a countervailing duty rate for Consolidated Plaintiff and Defendant-Intervenor Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. (“Heze”),4 a mandatory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Cs Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025
  2. Zhaoyuan Junbang Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API