Legal Opinion
Staff v. Hawkins
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1949PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
Plaintiff and defendant are adjoining landowners. Their lots bound south on Howard Avenue in Norwalk. The location of the boundary line between their properties is the basis of the present dispute. The plaintiff brought an action of trespass for the wrongful invasion of her rights and claimed an injunction and damages. Title was pleaded but is only incidentally relevant to a possessory action of this character. Milardo v. Branciforte, 109 Conn. 693, 695, 145 A. 573; Burlington v. Twining, 115 Conn. 45, 48, 160 A. 300. The parties tried the case as though title was the main issue and it will…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Housatonic Valley Insurance Agency, Inc. v. KlipsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Banks v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Pennsylvania-Dixie Cement Corp. v. H. Wales Lines Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Burakowski v. GrustasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Patzloff v. KasperovichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Housing Authority v. PezenikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Aczas v. Stuart Heights, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Koennicke v. MaioranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Mihalczo v. Borough of WoodmontSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.