Legal Opinion

Burakowski v. Grustas

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 3, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiff’s complaint alleged a cause of action against the defendant Anthony Grustas for seducing and carnally knowing the plaintiff’s wife. It also alleged the transfer by Anthony of his automobile to the defendant Edward Grustas with intent to prevent its attachment on the plaintiff’s claim and the knowing participation of the defendant Edward in carrying out this purpose. The plaintiff claimed damages and a decree that the transfer be set aside. The defendant Anthony was defaulted for nonappearance. The court rendered judgment for $2500 damages against him and judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Fox v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
  3. Johnson v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Skovronski v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Defeo v. HindingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Gill v. Petrazzuoli Bros.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Murphy v. DantowitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  5. Hope v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API