Legal Opinion
Koennicke v. Maiorano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 10, 1996No. 14167PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHealey, J.
The plaintiff, W. William Koennicke, instituted this action in a complaint in four counts against the defendant, Curt A. Maiorano, seeking to quiet title to a disputed portion of land that runs along the boundary between his property and that of the defendant in the town of Hampton. Generally speaking, their properties adjoin each other. The plaintiff also seeks damages for the cutting of trees and for trespass and title by adverse possession.1
The first count, which seeks to quiet title, alleges that the defendant claims an estate or interest by deed in “an undefined portion” of the land of…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Getty Petroleum Corp. v. Bartco Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- LaReau v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Blakeney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Stohlts v. GilkinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Interest of B.L.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Lisiewski v. SeidelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- ARGENTINIS v. FortunaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.