Legal Opinion
Aczas v. Stuart Heights, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 5, 1966PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
This action was brought in three counts, but only the first two are involved in this appeal. The first count alleges the breach of a covenant against encumbrances contained in a warranty deed in the usual form running from the named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, to the plaintiffs. The second alleges misrepresentation predicated upon the same covenant. The only alleged encumbrance relevant to this appeal consists of an easement to the city of Waterbury to construct and maintain a sanitary sewer line through the premises conveyed to the plaintiffs. The court generally…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Hubbard v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1835
- Commonwealth Fuel Co. v. McNeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Banks v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- City of New London v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Richard v. A. Waldman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Balch Pontiac-Buick, Inc. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.