Legal Opinion

Falkum v. Daniel Starch & Staff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1965No. 39547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, C.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Commission denying Ann A. Falkum, employee-relator, compensation on the grounds that the personal injury she sustained in an automobile accident did not arise out of and in the course of her employment.

The employee was approximately 58 years of age at the time of the accident and resided in Austin, Minnesota, about five blocks from where the accident occurred.

She commenced work with Daniel Starch & Staff, New York business research consultants, employer-respondent, about the middle of March 1960. She was hired to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Casey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. Yureko v. Prospect Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Oestreich v. Lakeside Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi SororitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Rau v. Crest Fiberglass IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Williams v. Hoyt Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Hill v. TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API