Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi Sorority

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 6, 1950No. 35,092PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying compensation on the ground that relator’s injury did not arise out of and in the course of her employment.

Relator, Dora Kaplan, was employed as house mother for the respondent Alpha Epsilon Phi Sorority. She lived in the sorority house, which is located near the University of Minnesota campus in Minneapolis. Girls who come from homes outside the city live and regularly take their meals in the sorority house. Other members from the Twin Cities area eat occasional meals at the house. Relator, who was subject to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Klika v. Independent School District No. 79Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brookhaven Steam Laundry v. WattsMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dombach v. Olkon Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Cook v. Highway Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  4. Rau v. Crest Fiberglass IndustriesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Falkum v. Daniel Starch & StaffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API