Legal Opinion

Rau v. Crest Fiberglass Industries

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1967No. 40070PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation upon the finding that an employee’s injury arose out of and in the course of her employment.

The employee, Mary D. Rau, was injured in a two-car collision on August 24, 1962. At that time she was admittedly employed as a bookkeeper and was also serving as secretary-treasurer of Crest Fiberglass Industries, a corporation which she and her husband, Marvin, had recently organized and of which they were the sole shareholders. The cor poration manufactured fiberglass boats in a garage at St.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Oestreich v. Lakeside Cemetery Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Kaplan v. Alpha Epsilon Phi SororitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Lindell v. Minnesota American Legion Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. Ruud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brennan v. BrennanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Nelson v. Lutheran Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Williams v. Hoyt Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Waalk v. TONKAWOOD CONST. CO., INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Titus v. FOX CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API