Legal Opinion

Hill v. TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANY

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1968No. 40680Published

1Opinion of the Court

157 N.W.2d 374 (1968)

Elmer E. HILL, Respondent,

v.

TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANY, et al., Relators.

No. 40680.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

March 15, 1968.

Carroll, Cronan, Roth & Austin & Thomas A. Foster, Minneapolis, for relators.

Daniel Gallagher, St. Paul, for respondent.

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission. Relators urge that the referee and commission were in error in awarding compensation for injuries allegedly incurred outside the scope and course of employment.

The record would support the commission's determination that the employee, as a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Kaletha v. Hall Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Simonson v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Locke v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API