Legal Opinion
Claim of Dependents of Marks v. Gray
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1929PublishedCited by 354 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
Award has been made under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67) to the dependents of Isadore Marks for benefits found to be due by reason of his death. Whether the injury was one “ arising out of and in the course of the employment ” (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 2, subd. 7; § 10) is the question to be answered.
Marks was a helper in the service of a plumber. His home and his place of business were at Clifton Springs, New York. On April 16, 1927, his wife went to visit relatives at Shortsville, where her husband promised to call for her in the family car at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Clawson v. . Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Grieb v. . HammerleNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Roberts v. . J.F. Newcomb CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by354 opinions
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Barragar v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Watson v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.