Legal Opinion

Hill v. TERRAZZO MACHINE & SUPPLY COMPANY

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 15, 1968No. 40680PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission. Relators urge that the referee and commission were in error in awarding *429compensation for injuries allegedly incurred outside the scope and course of employment.

The record would support the commission’s determination that the employee, as a matter of routine and personal habit, generally arrived at his employer’s place of business at approximately 6:45 a. m. to assume his duties as a drill press operator. In practice, he would punch the time clock as soon as he arrived but would not actually get paid until 7 a. m. He…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Kaletha v. Hall Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Simonson v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandmeyer v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  2. Carey v. StadtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Kennecott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BissSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. State v. WillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API