Legal Opinion

Beazell v. Schrader

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1963No. L. A. 27195PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order which we construe to constitute, in part, a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend in an action wherein plaintiff seeks to recover a $10,000 commission on an oral agreement for his services as a real estate broker.

The first amended complaint herein alleges the making of the oral agreement for plaintiff’s employment to sell defendant’s apartment building; that plaintiff was to be compensated at the rate of 5 per cent of the sales price; that plaintiff obtained a purchaser to whom defendant sold the property for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Velasco v. Commercial Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Phillippe v. Shapell Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hill v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. California State Employees'assn. v. St. of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1973

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API