Legal Opinion
Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1994No. 93-1862PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
We dismiss this appeal.
As argued by the BOR and Karl Road, the law of the case would cause us to affirm the BTA’s decision. In Nolan v. Nolan (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 1, 11 OBR 1, 462 N.E.2d 410, syllabus, we stated:
“Absent extraordinary circumstances, such as an intervening decision by the Supreme Court, an inferior court has no discretion to disregard the mandate of a superior court in a prior appeal in the same case. (State, ex rel. Potain, v. Mathews [ (1979) ], 59 Ohio St.2d 29, 32 [13 O.O.3d 17, 391 N.E.2d 343], approved and followed.)”
According to Nolan, at 3, 11 OBR at 3, 462 N.E.2d at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Potain v. MathewsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Jones v. HarmonOhio Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Colonial Village, Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Smith v. O'ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Heck v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Morton International, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.