Legal Opinion

John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1948No. 31343PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The ultimate question in this case is: Did the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga county have jurisdiction under the facts presented to it in the action pending therein for a declaratory judgment to temporarily restrain the relators herein from proceeding further in certain actions pending in the Municipal Court of Cleveland, until there is a determination of the action for a declaratory judgment?

Some preliminary observations will be appropriate. The suit of Weenink, as plaintiff in its action in the Municipal Court of Cleveland, is one for a money judgment against the city itself and does not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carmody v. JusticeOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Garrison v. BroughOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Burtzlaff v. VickeryOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kane v. KaneOhio Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Burris v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Phillips v. PolcarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Racing Guild v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Sellers v. GerkenOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Judson v. SpahrOhio Supreme Court · 1987

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API