State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Because the order of the Eighth District Court of Appeals stated that “[t]here is an adequate remedy at law,” the board argues that it was a final decision on the merits of Schneider’s mandamus action, barring any further such action by him.
“* * * [T]he principle of res judicata * * * is that ‘a final judgment or decree rendered upon the merits, without fraud or collusion, by a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive of rights, questions and facts in issue as to the parties and their privies, and is a complete bar to any subsequent ac*282tion on the same claim or cause of action between the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State ex rel. Potten v. KuthOhio Supreme Court · 1980
3Cited by20 opinions
- Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Birdsall v. StephensonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Davis v. Eachus, Unpublished Decision (10-22-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- City of Girard v. Trumbull County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.