Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1988No. 87-523PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Because the order of the Eighth District Court of Appeals stated that “[t]here is an adequate remedy at law,” the board argues that it was a final decision on the merits of Schneider’s mandamus action, barring any further such action by him.

“* * * [T]he principle of res judicata * * * is that ‘a final judgment or decree rendered upon the merits, without fraud or collusion, by a court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive of rights, questions and facts in issue as to the parties and their privies, and is a complete bar to any subsequent ac*282tion on the same claim or cause of action between the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. John Weenink & Sons Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State ex rel. Potten v. KuthOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Birdsall v. StephensonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Davis v. Eachus, Unpublished Decision (10-22-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. City of Girard v. Trumbull County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API