Legal Opinion

Jones v. Harmon

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1930No. 22155PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This case arises out of a collision between automobiles driven by the plaintiff in error, Willis Jones, and the defendant in error Saloma Harmon, respectively, at the intersection of inter-county highway No. 236 in Logan county and the Greenville Treaty pike in the same county. Both automobiles were injured, and the plaintiffs below, who are a partnership doing business under the name of Harmon & Harmon, at Bellefontaine, Ohio, filed an action for damages. The defendant joined issue by an answer and cross-petition, to which a reply was filed. The pleadings are not important in the discussion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gohman v. City of St. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Presti v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. FarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. Hopkins v. DyerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Transamerica Insurance v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Columbus Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API