State ex rel. Heck v. Kessler
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Initially, relators note that Staton has died and that the action is moot as to him. Accordingly, that portion of relators’ complaint for extraordinary relief is properly dismissed as moot. The following discussion is limited to May, defendant in the remaining underlying criminal case pending before Judge Kessler.
As to their claim for a writ of mandamus, relators must establish a clear legal right to have Judge Kessler try May on the ethnic intimidation charge, a corresponding clear legal duty on the part of Judge Kessler, and the absence of a plain and adequate remedy at law. State ex rel.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Cordray v. MarshallOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Willacy v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Leonard v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.