Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Potain v. Mathews

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1979No. 78-1082PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Per curiam

Despite the factual complexity of the proceedings culminating in this appeal, the legal issues presented herein are relatively simple. The principal question before this court is whether & common pleas court is bound by the mandate of an appellate court rendered in a prior appeal in the same case.

Eespondent-appellant, the judge in the Common Pleas Court, contends that he did not abuse his discretion by refusing to strike the second amended complaint in the caso then before him. The short answer to this contention is that appellant had no discretion to refuse to strike that complaint, at least…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dan Smoot v. Honorable Noel P. Fox, United States District Judge for the Western District of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hawley v. RitleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. City of Hubbard ex rel. Creed v. SaulineOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hopkins v. DyerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API