Legal Opinion
Coy v. Starling
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 6, 1981No. A 7901 00002, CA 18322PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in this action for damages based upon fraud. 1 We review the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, Blake v. Haggard, 46 Or App 95, 100, 610 P2d 1235, rev den 289 Or 587 (1980), and affirm.
Defendants, who operated a motel in South Dakota, moved to Oregon in February, 1977, after purchasing the Seahorse Motel in Lincoln City the preceding month for $350,000. In July, 1977, defendants decided to sell the motel. They signed a listing agreement in October, 1977, which indicated the amount of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Webb v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bulbman, Inc. v. Nevada BellNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Vasquez-Lopez v. Beneficial Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Oregon Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Simat, Helliesen & EichnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Gregory v. NovakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.