Farmers & Merchants State Bank, an Idaho Banking Corporation v. Western Bank, an Oregon Banking Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Western Bank (“Western”) appeals from a decision of the district court, holding it liable to Farmers & Merchants State Bank (“F & M”) in the amount of $708,133.07 plus interest, costs, and attorney’s fees. Both banks were victims of a check-kiting scheme. F & M brought this diversity action to recover from Western the amount of a cashier’s check drawn by and on Western, payable to ah F & M customer. Western issued the check to F & M in settlement for thirteen checks drawn by a Western customer and presented for payment to Western by F & M. When Western refused to honor…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- McLINN v. FJORDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Charles Laduke v. Alan C. Nelson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Unico v. OwenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hall-Mark Electronics Corp. v. Sims (In Re Lee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Warren Finance, Inc. v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville, NASupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Dionisio Sainz Gonzalez v. Banco De Santander-Puerto Rico, Dionisio Sainz Gonzalez v. Banco De Santander-Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN HARVEY v. Colonial BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Windsor Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.