Legal Opinion

Oregon Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 2004No. 9610-08259, 9802-01053; A107124PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

This complex, factually dense case concerns the construction of an aircraft maintenance facility at Portland International Airport (PDX) and the financing of a start-up company to operate that facility. Defendants Michael Reinbold and David Simon, developers of the combined project, appeal from a trial court judgment in favor of plaintiff, the Oregon Public Employees’ Retirement Board (OPERB), which guaranteed the bonds that financed the project. Plaintiff cross-appeals. On appeal, we: (1) reverse the judgment against both Reinbold and Simon on plaintiffs fraud claim; (2) affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Vasquez-Lopez v. Beneficial Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Hambleton Bros. Lumber Co. v. Balkin Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Vukanovich v. KineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Wieber v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API