Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Holmberg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1945PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action in deceit brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs as the result of false representations made by the defendant inducing the purchase from the latter of personal property constituting the equipment of a beer tavern in Portland, Oregon.

After the jury had returned a verdict for the plaintiffs, the court, on motion, granted judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto, and plaintiffs have appealed.

The single question for decision is whether the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict for the plaintiffs.

The complaint alleges in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Downey v. . FinucaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Sharkey v. Burlingame Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Palmetto Bank & Trust Co. v. GrimsleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. Horner v. WagyOregon Supreme Court · 1944

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Conzelmann v. Northwest Poultry & Dairy Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Caldwell v. Pop's Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Johnson v. CoferOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Holland v. LentzOregon Supreme Court · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API